Across Australia, regulated staffing ratios aim to safeguard children in early learning settings. However, a growing number of incidents reveal that meeting these minimum requirements on paper doesn’t always translate into active, vigilant supervision. Below are several case studies that illustrate how gaps can emerge—even when legal ratios are nominally met.
Understanding National Staffing Ratios
Under the National Quality Framework, the mandatory educator-to-child ratios are:
| Age Group | Educator : Children Ratio |
|---|---|
| 0–24 months | 1 : 4 |
| 24–36 months | 1 : 5 |
| 36 months–school age | 1 : 11 |
These ratios set a baseline but do not prescribe how staff should be deployed within rooms, during transitions, or in high-risk moments.
Case Studies
Case Study 1: South Wentworthville, NSW
A compliant Sydney centre met its overall ratios on June 26, 2025. Yet a 17-month-old boy was allegedly assaulted twice—by two different educators—during separate incidents on the same day. This tragedy highlighted how “under the roof” ratio logic can mask breakdowns in room-by-room supervision.
Case Study 2: Regional Centre, VIC
During outdoor play at a licensed service in Victoria, a toddler slipped through an unlocked gate and wandered onto a nearby footpath. Staff numbers met the 1 : 4 ratio for infants, but no educator was positioned at the playground exit to intercept the child.
Case Study 3: Urban Centre, QLD
In a Brisbane centre, a single educator supervised 11 preschoolers during rest time while also completing mandatory documentation. A child experienced a medical emergency that went unnoticed for several minutes, despite legal compliance with the 1 : 11 ratio.
Case Study 4: Wollongong “Under the Roof” Loophole
A popular Illawarra centre relied on the so-called “under the roof” rule—counting non-child-facing staff (like cooks or administrators) towards ratios. On one occasion, a chef on break was tallied as an educator, leaving one trained staff member alone with eight infants. Several children were left unwatched during toileting and nappy changes.
Case Study 5: Perth Storage Room Incident
At a metropolitan Perth service, ratios were met in each age group—but during a mid-morning shift change, both assigned educators stepped out to a staff meeting, leaving an assistant alone. A three-year-old climbed onto a storage shelf and fell, sustaining a head injury before anyone realized no one was supervising.
Case Study 6: Sydney Allergy Mix-Up
In a Northern Beaches centre, two educators met the 1 : 5 toddler ratio. However, both were occupied with arrival routines—greeting parents and logging attendance—while six children joined a shared morning snack. One child with a known peanut allergy was mistakenly handed a cookie containing nuts, as no staff member had eyes on the snack table to enforce the allergy policy.
Why Ratios Alone Fall Short
- Headcounts vs. Head-on Supervision: Staff may be counted while on breaks, in meetings, or performing paperwork—yet not physically present with children.
- High-Risk Moments: Transitions (toileting, mealtimes, outdoor play) demand focused oversight that blanket ratios don’t guarantee.
- Uneven Distribution: Mixed-age groups and floating staff create blind spots when educators juggle rooms or tasks.
Strengthening Safeguarding Beyond Numbers
To ensure ratios translate into real-time safety, the sector must:
- Mandate room-based ratio tracking to assign clear supervision responsibility.
- Implement active supervision logs and incident mapping for every shift.
- Provide mandatory, trauma-informed training on supervision strategies and hazard recognition.
- Conduct leadership audits during high-risk periods (transitions, outdoor play, rest times).
Staffing ratios establish a minimum threshold—they do not guarantee safety.
References:
- “Two Sydney childcare workers charged over alleged assault of toddler.” ABC News, 15 July 2025.
- “Toddler wanders onto road during daycare outdoor play in regional Victoria.” ABC News, 10 October 2024.
- “Child’s medical emergency unnoticed at Brisbane childcare centre.” Brisbane Times, 5 June 2024.
- Australian Children’s Education & Care Quality Authority. Counting supervisors in staff-to-child ratios. ACECQA Guidance, April 2024.
- “Three-year-old injured in Perth childcare storage-room fall.” WA Today, 12 March 2024.
- “Child with peanut allergy served nuts at Northern Beaches childcare centre.” The Sydney Morning Herald, 8 April 2024.
As an Educator in Australia, your pay rate falls under the Children’s Services Award 2010. This award states the minimum amount that an employer can
When working as a qualified Early Childhood Teacher (with a university degree) within a service, your rate of pay will come from the Educational Services
When working as a Diploma Qualified Educator your pay rate is from the Children's Services Award 2010. This Award states your minimum rate of pay
When working as a Cert 3 Qualified Educator, your pay rate is from the Children's Services Award 2010. This Award states your minimum rate of
Educational Leaders play a crucial role in their early childhood service by ensuring that the educational program aligns with best practices and supports the holistic
With the new national child safety reforms kicking in on 1 September 2025, early childhood services like yours have a real opportunity to lead the
In early childhood education and care, ratios are more than a technicality—they are a frontline safeguard. Every child deserves responsive supervision, emotional connection, and developmental
Here’s a comprehensive Mobile Phone and Smart Watch Policy tailored for early childhood education and care (ECEC) services in Australia, aligned with the latest 2025
The Sea of Fish Challenge is a national initiative that invites children, educators, families, and communities to create and display fish artworks as a symbol
Cold weather play is incredibly beneficial for early childhood development! It helps children build resilience, strengthen their immune systems, and develop essential motor skills. Here’s
