It’s common for students to be asked to help with cleaning, tidying, and supervising children outdoors. These tasks are part of daily routines and give you insight into how services operate. However, if your placement hours are limited to cleaning and basic supervision, you’re missing out on the learning opportunities placements are designed to provide.

“How are new graduates supposed to gain experience if we are never given a chance?” This question, voiced by many new educators, captures a frustrating reality in our sector. After completing placements and earning qualifications, countless graduates find themselves rejected from job applications because they lack “experience.” Yet placements themselves involve real responsibility—planning programs, observing children, engaging families, and meeting compliance standards. Why isn’t this recognised?

Recent alerts from TEQSA (Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency) and ASQA (Australian Skills Quality Authority) have raised concerns about students being funnelled into childcare courses without genuine interest or adequate preparation. Migration agents and private colleges offering fast-tracked qualifications are contributing to a surge of students entering placements without mandatory checks or sufficient training.

Stepping into the role of director brings many responsibilities, and one of the most important is recruiting and supporting new trainees. For many candidates, this is their very first job in the sector. They may be young, inexperienced, and nervous, yet they hold the potential to grow into strong educators who enrich your team.

This article explores practical approaches to interviewing trainees, ensuring the process is supportive, insightful, and aligned with the values of early childhood education.

Our early childhood sector is facing a troubling paradox. On one hand, thousands of students are enrolling in Certificate III programs, eager to join the workforce. On the other hand, services are reporting that these trainees arrive on placement underprepared, leaving educators overwhelmed and children underserved. This mismatch between training and practice is not just frustrating—it’s unsustainable.

Placements are designed to be safe, structured opportunities for students to learn, observe, and gradually build confidence in their professional practice. They are not employment contracts, nor should they be used to fill staffing gaps. When boundaries blur, students can feel pressured, undervalued, and even exploited. Understanding the difference between learning and labour is essential for both centres and students.

Macquarie University’s Bachelor of Education (Early Childhood)—StepAhead Program is designed for diploma-qualified educators with at least two years of post-diploma work experience. It provides a pathway to upgrade existing qualifications into a full bachelor’s degree, recognising prior learning and professional practice.

Under ACECQA’s National Quality Framework, educators are deemed “qualified” if they hold a Certificate III, Diploma, or approved university degree. But qualification does not equal competence. The current system allows individuals with unrelated undergraduate degrees to complete a one-year postgraduate course and enter classrooms, often with minimal practical experience or emotional readiness. The result? A workforce flooded with technically qualified but emotionally disconnected practitioners some of whom openly admit they “don’t like kids” and entered the profession for visa access or job security.

The Diploma of Early Childhood Education and Care gives you an opportunity to explore more career options. From creative resource design to inclusion support, leadership, or advocacy, it offers a rich landscape of opportunities beyond the traditional role of working as an educator in an early learning setting. The following article provides examples of different career pathways for your Diploma qualification.

The Australian Skills Quality Authority, in collaboration with HumanAbility and sector partners, has released updated guidance to strengthen how early childhood education and care students are assessed during workplace placements. This article unpacks the key elements of the guidance, highlights unacceptable practices, and offers best-practice recommendations for registered training organisations and ECEC services.