In early childhood education, ratios are more than numbers. They are the heartbeat of safety, connection, and quality care. Yet across Australia, educators are sounding the alarm: current ratios are failing both children and staff. The sector is bleeding talent, and the emotional toll is mounting. It’s time to reform ratios—not just to meet minimum standards, but to honour the dignity of every child and the well-being of every educator.
The Reality on the Ground
Educators are leaving the sector in record numbers. Many cite burnout, emotional fatigue, and fear. Fear of missing a child’s distress signal. Fear of being blamed when something goes wrong. Fear of working in environments where they cannot possibly meet every child’s needs.
“I had four toddlers crying, one trying to climb a shelf, and another running toward the gate. I froze. I couldn’t be everywhere. I left the sector two weeks later.” — Former Educator, VIC
“We’re expected to document, supervise, nurture, and regulate—all while being outnumbered. It’s not safe. It’s not fair.” — Lead Educator, QLD
The Case for a “Four Eyes” Policy
The “Four Eyes” principle—ensuring two adults are present during high-risk moments (e.g., toileting, transitions, excursions)—is a cornerstone of safeguarding in many sectors. Yet in early childhood settings, educators are often left alone with large groups, especially during breaks or staff shortages.
This compromises visibility, emotional safety, and procedural fairness. It also places educators in vulnerable positions, where allegations or incidents can arise without witnesses or support.
What Ratio Reform Could Look Like
-
Smaller Group Sizes
Especially for infants and toddlers, where emotional attunement and physical safety are paramount. -
Mandatory “Four Eyes” Coverage
During all transitions, toileting, and outdoor play. -
Flexible Ratios for High-Needs Contexts
Including trauma-informed settings, neurodivergent cohorts, and culturally diverse communities. -
Wellbeing-Driven Staffing Models
Ratios that account for educator breaks, documentation time, and emotional decompression.
The Emotional Cost of Improper Ratios
Poor ratios don’t just impact logistics—they erode emotional safety. Children may feel unseen. Educators may feel overwhelmed, hypervigilant, or emotionally shut down. This undermines the very essence of early learning: connection, trust, and joy.
“I stopped singing with the children. I was too busy counting heads.” — Educator, NSW
A Call to Regulators
We urge policymakers to:
- Listen to frontline educators—not just peak bodies.
- Review incident data through a trauma-informed lens.
- Embed emotional safety into ratio frameworks.
- Fund ratio reform as a matter of child protection and workforce sustainability.
Ratio reform is not a luxury. It’s a necessity. It’s how we see every child. It’s how we support every educator. It’s how we restore trust in a sector that holds our youngest citizens.
Further Reading
Educator To Child Ratio Calculator To Calculate Minimum Number
Mixed Age Ratios In An Early Childhood Service
Active Supervision vs In Ratio: Why Both Matter
Under the Roof Ratios
Implementing Under The Roof Ratios
Educator to Child Ratios In Early Childhood Services
Safe Ratio Recommendations In Early Childhood Services
Critical Reflection Questions For Ratios
Opinion: Are Current Childcare Staffing Ratios Enough