Across the early childhood education and care sector, educators are sounding the alarm: current staffing ratios are insufficient to deliver safe, meaningful, and developmentally appropriate care. While recent reforms have focused on mobile phone bans and child safety protocols, many in the sector argue that these measures overlook a deeper structural issue—chronic understaffing driven by profit-based ratio models.
What Are the Current Ratios?
Under the National Quality Framework (NQF), minimum educator-to-child ratios vary by age group:
- 0–24 months: 1 educator to 4 children
- 24–36 months: 1 to 5
- 36 months to school age: 1 to 11 (in most states)
While these ratios meet regulatory minimums, educators report that they do not reflect the real-world demands of caring for children with diverse needs, managing documentation, and maintaining safe, responsive environments.
Educators across platforms like Aussie Childcare Network have voiced frustration:
- “We don’t have enough educators. These ratios are made for profit, not for quality care.”
- “Ratios need to be addressed as a priority, but so do wages.”
- “You can’t meet children’s emotional needs or ensure safety when you’re stretched so thin.”
These comments reflect a growing consensus: current ratios prioritize cost-efficiency over child well-being, leaving educators overwhelmed and children underserved.
The Impact on Practice
Insufficient ratios contribute to:
- Burnout and turnover: Educators face unsustainable workloads, leading to high attrition rates.
- Reduced quality of interactions: Limited time for one-on-one engagement, emotional support, and play-based learning.
- Compromised safety: Fewer eyes on children increases the risk of accidents or missed signs of distress.
Advocates are calling for:
- Lower ratios across all age groups, especially in infant and toddler rooms.
- Funding models that prioritize quality over profit, including wage increases and retention incentives.
- Transparent ratio reviews, informed by educator testimony and child development research.
As Australia confronts a childcare crisis, addressing educator-to-child ratios is not just a regulatory issue—it’s a moral imperative.
Further Reading
Mixed Age Ratios In An Early Childhood Service
Under the Roof Ratios
Educator To Child Ratio Calculator
Implementing Under The Roof Ratios
Educator to Child Ratios In Early Childhood Services
NSW Staff Ratios and Adequate Supervision
Safe Ratio Recommendations In Early Childhood
Critical Reflection Questions For Ratios
Opinion: Are Current Childcare Staffing Ratios Enough
Opinion: Should the “Under the Roof” Staffing Loophole Be Closed
Ratios and Burnout: The Hidden Cost of “Minimum Standards”
Educator To Child Ratio Posters