Hi,
I’m in the same boat with my Diploma assignment, so I’ll share how I decide which EYLF outcome to link to an activity and how I justify that choice in my reflections.
For the coloured rice sensory play with scoops, I would pick Outcome 4: Children are confident and involved learners as the primary outcome — but I would explicitly state that Outcome 3 is also supported as a secondary outcome. Why I choose Outcome 4 first is because my learning intention for the session is focused on exploration, problem solving and persistence: kids experiment with different scooping strategies, compare quantities, test cause and effect, and demonstrate concentration. Those are classic indicators of Outcome 4 (curiosity, resourcefulness
draw climber, sustained involvement).
How I justify it in documentation:
• Start with the intent: “The purpose of this activity was to encourage exploration of texture and quantity and to foster problem solving through open-ended sensory play.”
• Link observable behaviours to the outcome: “Child A used different sized scoops to transfer rice between containers, showing trial and error and adapting strategies when the rice spilled — evidence of persistence and emerging problem solving (Outcome 4).”
• Name explicit EYLF indicators: “This aligns with Outcome 4 because the child demonstrated curiosity, persistence and the ability to plan actions to achieve a goal.”
• Acknowledge other outcomes: “This activity also supported Outcome 3 (a sense of wellbeing) as children demonstrated enjoyment, secure interactions with peers and self-regulation when waiting their turn.”
Practical tips I use when writing reflections:
Decide your primary learning intention before the session. That intention determines which outcome you prioritise.
Collect focused evidence during the activity — photos, short anecdotal notes of language used, gestures, problem solving moments. Link each piece of evidence to a specific EYLF descriptor.
Phrase it clearly: use sentences like “This demonstrates… because…” For example: “This demonstrates Outcome 4 because the child persisted in testing scooping strategies and verbally compared outcomes.”
Include next steps: state how you will extend the learning (e.g., introduce measuring cups to extend numeracy or add storybooks about textures to extend vocabulary) — this strengthens your justification.
Be honest and specific: avoid broad statements like “supports many outcomes”; instead identify primary and secondary outcomes and give concrete evidence for each.
I hope that helps for my assessments it made a big difference to state a clear intention, gather two or three short pieces of evidence, and then explicitly map each piece to the EYLF language. Good luck with your Diploma work!