CHCIC301D Interact effectively with children.
Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2012 2:39 pm
Hi, people, this is the first time I have posted a question on this forum. Please tell me if i'm in the wrong place.
This isn't a specific assignment question but does relate to one of the questions: “What methods would you use to communicate appropriately with children regarding their age, developmental stage and culture?” (in subject CHCIC301D)
An activity in my course notes suggest using different forms of the same question depending on the age of the child. For example:
For an 18 month old you would use “Kye, have drink now?”
For a 2.5 year old you would use “Kye, you have a drink now?”
For a 4 year old you would use “Kye, would you like a drink now?”
My question: Should we really drop words out of our sentences when speaking to toddlers? I am so surprised that I have read this over and over again looking for something I have missed or misunderstood.
I would argue for using natural sentences with all the fill-in words, and natural speech rhythm when speaking to babies and children. The reason I suggest this – even when speaking to children who are developmentally in the stage of using holophrases or telgraphic speech, or even babble, is that for the child to eventually learn to speak in sentences they must surely have to hear sentences used. In addition the baby's early “speech” (after cooing) is babble that mimics the intonation and rhythm of normal speech. This means they are already listening to the natural rhythms of the language even while they are still babies, and before they have actual words. If we drop words out of sentences, surely we can't help but lose the rhythm and inflexion of speech that babies are tuning it to.
I would appreciate any discussion on this since I am having great difficulty reconciling myself to this approach.
This isn't a specific assignment question but does relate to one of the questions: “What methods would you use to communicate appropriately with children regarding their age, developmental stage and culture?” (in subject CHCIC301D)
An activity in my course notes suggest using different forms of the same question depending on the age of the child. For example:
For an 18 month old you would use “Kye, have drink now?”
For a 2.5 year old you would use “Kye, you have a drink now?”
For a 4 year old you would use “Kye, would you like a drink now?”
My question: Should we really drop words out of our sentences when speaking to toddlers? I am so surprised that I have read this over and over again looking for something I have missed or misunderstood.
I would argue for using natural sentences with all the fill-in words, and natural speech rhythm when speaking to babies and children. The reason I suggest this – even when speaking to children who are developmentally in the stage of using holophrases or telgraphic speech, or even babble, is that for the child to eventually learn to speak in sentences they must surely have to hear sentences used. In addition the baby's early “speech” (after cooing) is babble that mimics the intonation and rhythm of normal speech. This means they are already listening to the natural rhythms of the language even while they are still babies, and before they have actual words. If we drop words out of sentences, surely we can't help but lose the rhythm and inflexion of speech that babies are tuning it to.
I would appreciate any discussion on this since I am having great difficulty reconciling myself to this approach.